The issue of nonself (anatta in Pali) in Buddhism confuses many, including me. Most teachers simply report "there is no you." But the Buddha did not say this. First there is a translation issue with nonself and no-self. Anatta is the former. This leaves room for more meaning than just you are not a self. Second, is what is in the suttas. The Buddha says there is no permanent, unchanging, indivisibile self. So a change here can bring back some of the self. But most importantly, when pushed to comment on this, the Buddha said there is no self and no nonself. The Therevada monk and Buddhist scholar and translator Bikkhu Bodhi says that this is not meant to be a metaphysical truth. But rather something we practice by seeing what we are holding on to as a description of ourselves (I am a doctor, lawyer, mother, father, etc) because all of these may change and you are still there. We in Buddhism could use more focus on the 8 Fold Path and less on anatta to help with living the path each day.;